On May 3, 2017, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management (the Division) issued...
Tags: 'Utica Shale', Ohio, Oil and Gas, Energy
Deciding an issue of first impression in the state, Ohio’s Seventh District Court of Appeals recently held that oil and gas...
Tags: 'Utica Shale', Ohio, Dormant Mineral Act, DMA,
Following up on its recent decision in M&H P’Ship v. Hines, Ohio’s Seventh District Court of Appeals has offered further guidance...
Tags: 'Utica Shale', Ohio, Dormant Mineral Act, DMA,
Ohio’s Seventh District Court of Appeals recently interpreted the term “holder” under the 2006 version of the Ohio Dormant...
Tags: 'Utica Shale', Ohio, Dormant Mineral Act, DMA,
Ohio’s Seventh District Court of Appeals recently held that landmen are subject to the requirements of R.C. Chapter 4735...
Tags: landmen, Ohio, Oil and Gas, Energy,
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral arguments in Bohlen v. Anadarko. The Bohlens entered into a lease with...
Tags: Ohio, Oil and Gas, Energy, Utica
Today, in its Order List, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Jon D. Walker, Jr. v. Patricia J....
Tags: Ohio, Dormant Mineral Act, DMA, Oil and Gas,
Ohio producers will soon be able to transport more natural gas out of the state. In a recent article, the U.S. Energy Information...
Tags: Ohio, "Oil and Gas" Pipelines, Energy, Utica
On November 2nd, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. In its opinion, the Court...
Tags: 'Utica Shale', Ohio, Oil and Gas, Energy
In Sunoco Pipeline L.P. v. Teter, Ohio’s Seventh District Court of Appeals rejected a landowner challenge to Sunoco’s acquisition...
Tags: Ohio, Oil and Gas, Energy